BENCH:
45x10
89x12
116x7
138x5
154x3
172x3 190x3 <----new PR there.
also 194.5 x1 (technically 190x3 is moving more weight but i just wanted to lift the bigger amount too )
DB pullover = 25kg x 9
EDT BLOCK
Db incline bench = 25kg 8,6
db rows = 25kg 10,
workout ended early as im sick, ran out of energy.
just a addit guys, i wont be attempting my glp #6 today for lower body.
i am actually getting better, but went to the dr yesterday and got started on some antibiotics.... i dont like the idea of keeping 280pounds on my back with the risk of going into a coughing fit lol.
Awesome job man! I'm also at the last workouts of feast, and kinda feel like I'm on the last leg of the feast phase in terms of gaining more strength, so hopefully I can put up new PB's like you did!
Once again, great work! So are you going to go straight into Cruise Phase, or take some extra time off due to the sickness? Or are you all better now?
cruise will be aided by decreased cals (close to maintenance) added cardio (when its not raining 24/7!) and the accompany of Oxyelite Pro + Lean Xtreme!
messed up my first day, for some reason thought i was only supposed to do 4 sets, my bad.
Bench=
45x10
89x5
133x5
161x5x4 (this was surprisingly harder than i thought it would be... focusing on 100% depth plus technique)
seated press=
45x5
67x5
89x5x4 (found this uber easy)
close grip bench press static hold=
133lbs x 15s, 14s
(think i used too much weight for the static hold, will try a little lighter next time and find the sweet spot to hold her at)
during the first 2 weeks of feast and the first 5 workouts i noticed stupidly impressive gains (in size + strength and decreased bodyfat)... i was wondering if there is a way to do mini-blueprint cycles like this?
i done a search and found some info on ABCDE (anabolic burst cycle dieting and exercise) which looks promising using similar attributes!
A. There are but they're already "built in" so to speak via the 5 workout bridge, GLP #1 and EDT blocks.
ABCDE will work (to an extent) but the two week timeframes specified are too short, unfortunately. PART of the research for 2.0 came from that study/article, so there is some merit in what Akerfeldt is saying..